Variations on MDT
Lively Data : July 13, 2005
We saw last month (cf "Kuroshio and Gulf Stream") ocean circulation in the North Pacific and North Atlantic areas by mapping variance of Sea Level Anomalies (SLA).
Basically, choice of SLA - instead of Absolute Dynamic Topography (ADT)- is  due to its availability in low resolution: otherwise computing variance in high  resolution for a large area over several year is too long for the LAS. And by  definition, at a given date:
 
ADT=SLA+MDT
For example, here are three maps plotted with LAS on December 8, 2004, respectively dynamic topography, sea level anomalies, and errors on these anomalies:
Absolute dynamique topography (merged data), sea level anomalies (merged data) and formal mapping error on SLA on December 8, 2004. Formal mapping error for merged data is accessible when choosing "NRT-SLA" as dataset; this map is also representative of errors made on ADT. We can opt for a map with no contours when writing (0,0,0) in "contour levels" option via "output options"; concerning color scale, it is possible to modify (minimum value, maximum value, step) in "fill levels" still available in "output options".
In the same way, on June 8, 2005:
Mean dynamic topography (i.e ADT-SLA) computed respectively  on December 8, 2004 and on June 8, 2005.
We used "compare two" option, then  we defined suitable datasets and dates, and finally choosed "comparison plot".
MDT represents the stationnary component of total current, so MDT is still  the same from a date to another. 
Thus, about oceanic variability,  
var(ADT)=var(SLA)+var(MDT)=var(SLA)
 Use the  Live Access Server
 Use the  Live Access Server






 
             
             
             
             
             
             
             
             Products
Products 

 
			
			 
			 
			 
			 
			


 
    